Sizewell C builds on the UK’s legacy of nuclear innovation – following Sizewell A and B – and marks a major step forward in the country’s energy transition. This nationally significant infrastructure project will deliver reliable, low-carbon electricity for millions of homes, strengthening energy security for decades to come.
Located next to an operational nuclear power station and a Site of Special Scientific Interest, the project demanded robust, efficient solutions for major excavations and retaining structures on a geologically complex ground.
Collaborating closely with Sizewell C, Arup reviewed initial proposals and worked together to refine the ground engineering approach. By leveraging in-situ ground treatment, a plastic diaphragm wall and localised retaining structures, we reduced construction risk and improved efficiency.
Our use of advanced digital tools – including a 3D ground model – enabled robust seismic and settlement assessments, building confidence with both Sizewell C and regulators. This approach minimised the need for extensive anchors and reinforcement, helping the project to avoid significant delays.
The alternative scheme allowed for phased excavation, groundwater cut-off closer to Sizewell B, and in-situ treatment of soft material. These measures helped overcome the challenges posed by an infilled paleochannel – a buried ancient riverbed – and high groundwater levels.
Engineering for uncertain ground
Our team tackled the site’s complex geology, including a paleochannel infilled with peat, clay-rich soils, beach deposits and legacy materials from Sizewell B. These ground conditions, along with a high-water table and deep excavation requirements, posed significant challenges.
Arup was initially appointed to review the proposed enabling works design. The original scheme included a structural diaphragm wall and multiple levels of ground anchors, which presented major programme, cost, and logistical risks.
Working closely with Sizewell C, we constructively challenged the original specifications to combine the retaining structure and groundwater cut-off. Once this was removed, we developed an alternative scheme using an unreinforced plastic diaphragm wall for water cut-off, paired with sloped excavation and local retaining walls. This approach simplified logistics, eliminated the need for large volumes of reinforcing steel, and met all functional and performance requirements