Drawing on our experience with the City Water Resilience Approach, we worked with stakeholders in UAUK to build local development plans, priorities, performance metrics and potential policy levers into the model. We held regular workshops with stakeholders including the Ministry of Water and Sanitation, The World Bank, Addis Ababa Water and Sanitation Agency and academics from Addis Ababa University.
These workshops helped us incorporate vital local knowledge and to take account of the local political, economic and geographical context in our recommendations. This ensures that investment in infrastructure will always be targeted where it’s most needed, whether that investment takes place in five, ten or twenty years’ time.
We also built capacity among key departments and academics in Ethiopia. Sharing our experience, open-source tools and processes means that local teams can use, review and adapt the pathway as needed. Arup’s experts have offered ongoing support to help maintain the model and support new users.
Managing demand for water
Our analysis revealed that high and rising demand for water is the most likely driver of a potential system failure, so strategies to manage demand are crucial. If this continues to be the most significant factor, our pathway will recommend options such as increased metering ratios, reducing non-revenue water and regulating abstraction. The pathway will also point to measures that address the root causes of high demand such as changing planning regulations to shift demand to locations with a more abundant water supply.
Grouping options into adaptive pathways suited to the different plausible futures gives a flexible roadmap to a more sustainable future. The short, medium, and long-term strategies provide a clear picture of the options for investment. This can be used by Ethiopia’s Ministry of Water and Energy, and by external organisations such as the World Bank.
If conditions such as economic activity change – or if better information becomes available, then the model can be re-calibrated. This will generate new recommendations to ensure that investment will help the water system to remain as resilient and robust as possible, whatever the future holds.
It could take ten or even twenty years to construct a new dam in the UAUK sub-basin. But the tools and processes we have developed are already supporting local decision-makers. They can now be confident they are taking evidence-based action that will help to safeguard the water supply for millions of people.